The Fish Gone Fishin :: Bishop Fish Essays

The Fish- Gone FishinThe Fish by Elizabeth Bishop is saturated with vivid imagery and rich description, which help the lecturer visualize the action. Bishops habituate of imagery, narration, and tone allow the reader to visualize the seek and constrain a bond with him, a bond in which the reader has a great deal of admiration for the fishs plight. The mental pictures created are, in fact, so brilliant that the reader believes incident actually happened to a real person, hence building respect from the reader to the fish. Initially the reader is bombarded with an intense image of the fish he is tremendous, battered, venerable, and homely. The reader is sympathetic with the fishs situation, and can relate because everyone has been fishing. Next, Bishop compares the fish to long-familiar household objects here and there / his brown skin hung in strips / like ancient wallpaper, / and its pattern of darker brown / was like wallpaper she uses two fables with common objects to creat e sympathy for the captive. Bishop then goes on to clearly illustrate what she means by wallpaper shapes like full-blown roses / stained and lost through age. She uses another simile here paired with descriptive phrases, and these effectively depict a personal image of the fish. She uses the familiar wallpaper comparison because it is some subject the readers can relate to their own lives. alike the ancient wallpaper analogy can refer to the fishs age. Although faded and aged he withstood the test of time, like the wallpaper. Bishop uses highly descriptive words like cloud and infested to create an even clearer mental picture. The word terrible is used to describe oxygen, and this is ironic because oxygen is usually beneficial, but in the case of the fish it is detrimental. The use of terrible allows the reader to visualize the fish gasping for breaths and fighting against the terrible oxygen, permitting us to see the fishs predicament on his level. The word frightening does essen tially the same thing in the next phrase, the frightening gills. It creates a negative image of something (gills) usually considered favorable, producing an intense visual with minimal words. Another simile is used to help the reader picture the fishs struggle coarse white flesh packed in like feathers. This wording intensifies the readers initial view of the fish, and creates a visual, again, on the readers level. Bishop next relates to the fish on a personal basis I looked into his eyes.

Candide Essay -- essays research papers

Francois Marie Arouet de Voltaires novella, Candide, incorporates many themes, yet concentrates a direct assault on the ideas of Leibniz and Pope. These two well-known philosophers both held the bandstand that the world created by God was the best of all possibilities, a world of perfect order and reason. Pope specifically snarl that each human be is a part of Gods great and all knowing plan or design for the world.Voltaire had a very opposite point of take hold of in that he saw a world of needless pain and suffering all around him. Voltaire, a deist, believed that God created the world, yet he felt that the people were living in a situation that was anything but perfect. Thus, the major theme of Candide is one of the world not being the best of all possibilities, sound of actions definitely not determined by reason or order, but by chance and coincidence.To prove his point, Voltaire uses pointed satire directed at various organizations and groups frequent in his time period. In particular, Voltaire takes aim at organized religion, in particular Catholicism, as well as aristocratic arrogance and warfare. All of Voltaires comments are precisely chosen to convey his point that those in power were completely corrupt in all their thoughts and actions.Throughout the entire book, Voltaire portrays religious men, such(prenominal) as monks and priests, as hypocrites who do not live up to the religious standards that they set upon others. Voltaire first attacks the men of the Church and their hypocrisy in chapter three. After escaping from the Bulgars, Candide was simply in need of nourishment and possibly medical attention, but could find no help. When he came upon a minister who had just spoken of charity, Candide asked for some food to eat, but was harshly turned away. After speaking of charity to others, the minister turned Candide away just because they didnt share the same view of the Pope. To fuck off matters worse, the ministers wife proceeded to thro w a pot of urine over Candides head. Voltaire used these rather repulsive acts to show the hypocrisy run aground in many church affiliated men of his time. iodine comminuted the minister was talking to the townspeople of charity and brotherly love, while the next minute he rudely dismissed a man in need of that very Christian ideal. While I dont completely take with Voltaire that the religious men of that time were so blatantly hypocritical, ... ... as it should be.Even after Candide traveled to England, he saw vicious acts of cruelty surrounding him. One example is the death of an admiral that did not have enough dead men to his credit, (111). Voltaire used this brutal death to show that the people of the times were more(prenominal) concerned with numbers than lives. A man was killed merely because he did not kill enough innocent victims. In Voltaires eyes, this was the worst form of viciousness he could imagine. In a world where everything has a purpose, Voltaire could not see where unreasonable deaths fit in. Although the novella, Candide, was partially written for entertainment purposes, it was primarily written to discredit the views of Leibniz and Pope. These philosophers felt that the world around them was just as God would have it, but Voltaire adamantly disagreed. He presented his point of view by satirizing the Church, the arrogance of aristocrats, and war and violence. Voltaire looked at the world with the idea that there could be something done about all the evil in the world. Although he knew the world would never be perfect, he wanted people to see that the world they were living in was one that could be improved upon.

The Great Saljuq Sultanate :: essays research papers

The Great Saljuq SultanateAlthough the Turks had played an important role in the Islamic world, before the 11th century, the arrival of the Saljuq Turks marks a new era in Islamic history. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the role of the Saljuq Turks in Islam. In doing so, the paper will be divided in two cancels. The first part will present the historical background of the arrival of the Saljuqs and their participation in Islamic politics. The second part will discuss the contribution of the Saljuq administrative strategy to Islamic politics.Turks had been participating in the Islamic politics well before the 11th century. For example, the Mamluks and the Ghaznawids were from Turkish stock certificate. What made the Saljuqs distinct from these earlier Turks is how they have penetrated Islamic politics. onward the 11th century, Mamluks and the Ghaznawids were slaves recruited as individuals and took power from inside. However, the Saljuqs came in as organized tribal group s and conquered the Persia and much of the border lands. The Saljuq conquest marked the beginning of Turkish find oneself in Persia. This rule arguably lasted until 1925. In 426/1035, the Saljuq brothers Toghril entreat and Chaghri Beg led the Saljuq tribe to move into Khurasan. The brothers battled against the Ghaznawids to take over Khurasan. According to the course reader, the Khurasan population accepted the Saljuq rule just as they had earlier accepted the Ghaznawids. Five years later the Ghaznawids regrouped and waged war against the Saljuqs. The Ghaznawids were defeated and never came back.The Beg brothers ruled together until the death of Chaghri Beg in 452/1060. Morgan notes that this shared power between the two brothers was in accordance with the Turkish conception of the nature of political sovereignty, which the Saljuqs had brought with them from central Asia. After they had defeated the Ghaznawids from Khurasan, the brothers sensed that their major threat was the Bu yids in western Persia and Iraq. It did not take long for the Saljuqs to eliminate the Buyids from Persia and Iraq. Toghril conquered Baghdad in 447/1055 and restored the Sunni rule. Consequently, Caliph Qaim granted the title of Sultan on Toghril. Although the Buyids and the Caliph coexisted in Baghdad, their relationship was not based on the Caliphs consent. The Buyids knew that most of their subjects in Baghdad were Sunni and half of their army were of Turkish origin whom may ally with the Sunnis.